Today I read a paper by Van Eemeren and Grootendorst on how to hear differences of opinion and work a solution -- or not. It is a scientific paper, not merely wise advice or common sense. I shall pass on here the first of ten phases that one should enter if one should have no interest in working a solution, and should wish to completely sabotage one's opponent. Phase I:
• Threaten him with sanctions
• Or play on his feelings of compassion
• But also discredit his expertise, impartiality, integrity, or credibility
OBSERVATION: It is a very interesting paper, however it raises many questions. Basically, the no. 1 scientific obstruction is: intimidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment