Saturday, February 6, 2016

Published Or Maybe

One of the publications I work on as a co-editor has a funny dynamic. In theory, articles are either published, or they are not. Then once published, if they are popular they enter the charts. However, one may place a "hidden" label on unpublished articles, so that they are in an intermediate place: while they are not "published", others may view them if they know where they are. This is very useful for obtaining input and critique. Once in a while, though, a hidden article goes viral so to speak, and something "unpublished" pops up in the charts. This is the case with my own latest article. In fact, I have received crucial input so far. OBSERVATION: This kind of "hidden" peer review is becoming more common today.

No comments: