I today submitted my magnum opus to a world class editor in Australia, a PhD.
My first editor, a BPhil, was very sharp. Apart from corrections, he
delivered one blow. He said I had failed to erase the things/relations
distinction as I thought I had done. He was right. Thankfully it was just another
step away. OBSERVATION: This distinction has done a lot of mischief in philosophy in my view, and manifests itself in many forms:
• the static and dynamic
• being and becoming (Parmenides)
• relations of ideas and matters of fact (David Hume)
• things and relations (Immanuel Kant)
• energeia and ergon (Wilhelm von Humboldt)
• objects and arrangements (Ludwig Wittgenstein)
• properties and relations (John Anderson)
• nouns and verbs (in language)
• variables and operators (in mathematics)
• the countable and the continuum (in mathematics)
• and events and relations
No comments:
Post a Comment