The Presbyterian Moderator, Rev. Dr. Peter Langerman, informed me last month that he had documentation from my old city Church -- and on this basis (I wrote) he made "improper" claims. My attorneys judged that they were "inconceivable" claims. The Moderator stated that he received this documentation from a Presbyterian minister. But the Presbyterian minister made a statement -- I received it belatedly through attorneys this week -- which flat contradicts the Moderator. In similar style as the Moderator, I am again denied the right of reply. OBSERVATION: How can the Moderator flat contradict his own source? Did he falsely state the source? Did his source contradict his own self? It is a sad story. It needs to be addressed.
No comments:
Post a Comment